A more accurate term might be **hyperlocal neighbourhoods**. There is a great deal of focus and attatchment to this concept, and there have been a large number of pilots in many countries.
The difficulty of achieving results with Hyperlocal Pilots, and the passion that advocates feel towards the goal has made it diffcult to learn from previous experience and progress towards shared goals.
Below I make a first attempt at documenting these strengths and weaknesses in writing: - Hyperlocal Strengths - Hyperlocal Problems - Hybrid not Hyperlocal
Marc's Structure
Here we will focus on neighborhood stakeholders and the relevant types of stakeholders. Will relate Bill Smith's AIC (Appreciation, Influence, and Control) to stakeholder interactions.
digraph { layout=dot rankdir=LR overlap=false concentrate=true node [style=filled shape=box] subgraph cluster2 {"Individuals\n& Households" Institutions Places} subgraph cluster1 {"Appreciation\nEvents" "Influence\nEvents" "Control\nEvents"} Stakeholders [color=purple1 fontcolor=white] "Individuals\n& Households" [color=purple1 fontcolor=white] Institutions [color=grey fontcolor=white] Places [color=green1] "Appreciation\nEvents" [color=yellow] "Influence\nEvents" [color=red] "Control\nEvents" [color=blue fontcolor=white] Stakeholders -> {"Individuals\n& Households" Places Institutions } [label=include] Stakeholders -> "Appreciation\nEvents" [label=participate] Stakeholders -> "Influence\nEvents" [label=use] Stakeholders -> "Control\nEvents" [label=organize] }
There will potentially be a great many stakeholders and a variety of types of stakeholders in a neighborhood. Every resident is a stakeholder. Everyone experiencing the neighborhood is in some way a stakeholder. Of course all businesses and governments operating in or with the neighborhood are stakeholders.